Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18
review-ietf-dots-requirements-18-genart-telechat-sparks-2019-02-13-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dots-requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 22) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2019-02-19 | |
| Requested | 2019-02-05 | |
| Authors | Andrew Mortensen , Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Robert Moskowitz | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-02-13 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -16
by Brian Weis
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Scott O. Bradner (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -16 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff) Genart Last Call review of -16 by Robert Sparks (diff) Genart Telechat review of -18 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-dots-requirements by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 18 (document currently at 22) | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2019-02-13 |
review-ietf-dots-requirements-18-genart-telechat-sparks-2019-02-13-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2019-02-13 IETF LC End Date: 2018-11-23 IESG Telechat date: 2019-02-21 Summary: Ready, but with a process issue for the shepherd and AD to consider. This version addressed all of my comments on version -16. Thank you. However, the diff shows that a large number of SHOULDs were changed to MUSTs. I'm guessing that was in response to a comment in the TSVART review of -16. This large scale substitution makes me worry - are they really the right adjustments? Has the group reviewed and agreed to these normative changes? As a nit, I'll note that the additional description of heartbeating creeps into specifying protocol rather than requirements.