Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-19
review-ietf-dots-telemetry-19-intdir-lc-lemon-2022-01-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type Last Call Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2022-01-24
Requested 2022-01-10
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Mohamed Boucadair , Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Ehud Doron, Meiling Chen , Jon Shallow
I-D last updated 2022-01-23
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -09 by Jan Lindblad (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -10 by Nagendra Kumar Nainar (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -14 by Jan Lindblad (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -19 by James Gruessing (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -19 by Ted Lemon (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -19 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -19 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ted Lemon
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-dots-telemetry by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/nS_d3ZONvOcb6E4nCnJ7qFBQ_jc
Reviewed revision 19 (document currently at 25)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2022-01-23
review-ietf-dots-telemetry-19-intdir-lc-lemon-2022-01-23-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-dots-telemetry. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along
with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on
the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

I do not see any issues in this document that would suggest that the INT Area
directors should object to it. The document appears to be a combination of
three things: a description of the context in which what is specified would be
useful; a collection of advice about operational considerations when using what
is specified; and finally the actual specification. To the best of my ability
to evaluate it, it seems to be complete, and it should be possible to use it as
a basis for an implementation.

Although I would prefer to see this document published as three separate
documents, each addressing one of the aforementioned topics, I don't think
that's a reasonable request to make during last call. As such, I'm going to say
that the document is ready to publish as is.