Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases-12
review-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases-12-secdir-lc-hallam-baker-2022-10-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2022-09-20
Requested 2022-09-06
Authors Yuhei Hayashi , Meiling Chen , Li Su
I-D last updated 2022-10-04
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -12 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -11 by Sean Turner (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Phillip Hallam-Baker
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/UfT9TDZ8no-BsED3F1niB1iYhOU
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-10-04
review-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases-12-secdir-lc-hallam-baker-2022-10-04-00
The document describes additional telemetry data types for DDoS signaling. As
such, the document appropriately references the security considerations in the
base specification, RFC9244.

Given the subject domain is adversarial, constant development of new attack
presentations is to be expected and thus the need for constant extension of the
telemetry description.

Where machine-learning techniques are used, it may be useful to provide a label
to distinguish the techniques in use so that other elements in the system can
react appropriately when the technique or parameters are changed.