Early Review of draft-ietf-drip-registries-09
review-ietf-drip-registries-09-tsvart-early-nishida-2023-05-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-drip-registries |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Transport Area Review Team (tsvart) | |
| Deadline | 2023-06-09 | |
| Requested | 2023-05-11 | |
| Requested by | Mohamed Boucadair | |
| Authors | Adam Wiethuechter , Jim Reid | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-05-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Tsvart Early review of -09
by Yoshifumi Nishida
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -09 by Derrell Piper (diff) Opsdir Early review of -09 by Joel Jaeggli (diff) Dnsdir Early review of -09 by Tim Wicinski (diff) |
|
| Comments |
As a preparation to the WGLC, we would like to have external reviews and fresh eyes to assess the specification and help identifying issues and fix them early in the process. Many thanks in advance. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Yoshifumi Nishida |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-drip-registries by Transport Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/ILXaOckSPS9Fk7Lc69af-4K5cMQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 18) | |
| Result | Not ready | |
| Completed | 2023-05-21 |
review-ietf-drip-registries-09-tsvart-early-nishida-2023-05-21-00
I believe this document is ready for publication as informational RFC. I think there is no transport related issue in the high level architecture described in the document.