Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-13

Request Review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 22)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-11-14
Requested 2019-10-30
Requested by Magnus Westerlund
Authors Edward Birrane, Kenneth McKeever
Draft last updated 2020-01-09
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -06 by Dan Harkins (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Tim Evens (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Dan Harkins (diff)
As the Early review indicated that the previous -06 version had issues, I would appreciate a re-review of the latest version. The document has passed IETF last call, but it will not be progressed to IESG for at least two weeks due to the main specification is currently going through IETF last call.
Assignment Reviewer Dan Harkins
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dtn-bpsec-13-secdir-lc-harkins-2020-01-09
Posted at
Reviewed rev. 13 (document currently at 22)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2020-01-07



   1000 pardons for the tardiness of this re-review. It fell through the
cracks and I was reminded of it during the end-of-the-year break.

   This draft is Ready With (a single) Nit.

   This draft is much improved over -06 which I previously reviewed. All
of my recommendations have been acted on (thank you). The addition of
AEAD for the BCB is a very good addition. The block interactions in 3.9
look correct and my only suggestion would be to remove "NOTE:" from the
final paragraph which implies it is informative. Also remove "probably"
because it is most decidedly insecure. Make this a normative paragraph
prohibiting an insecure construction.

   The examples are helpful, especially as one expands on the other,
that helps illustrate the 3.9 block interaction rules.