Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-11
review-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-11-genart-telechat-housley-2024-06-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-06-18
Requested 2024-06-09
Authors Rick Taylor , Edward J. Birrane
I-D last updated 2024-06-12
Completed reviews Artart Telechat review of -11 by Marco Tiloca (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Russ Housley (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -11 by Jean-Michel Combes (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -11 by Russ Housley (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -09 by Marco Tiloca (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ Housley
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/juHW-YYZ1lesibNd0gDxRvFE0HY
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 13)
Result Not ready
Completed 2024-06-12
review-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-11-genart-telechat-housley-2024-06-12-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-11
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2024-06-12
IETF LC End Date: Already complete
IESG Telechat date: 2024-06-20


Summary: Not Ready


Major Concerns:

RFC 7116 is an Informational RFC, and this document, if approved, will
be published an an RFC on the standards track.  It is very unusual for
a standards-track RFC to update an Informational RFC.  I suggest that
this document and a companion document ought to obsolete RFC 7116, where
the companion document separately handles all of the non-ipn topics in
RFC 7116.  The companion document can be an informational RFC.


Minor Concerns:

None


Nits:

Section 5.5: s/security source EID for/security source for/