Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01
review-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-12-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2013-12-06
Requested 2013-11-28
Draft last updated 2013-12-12
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by Scott Brim (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Leif Johansson (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Leif Johansson
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-12-12
Reviewed rev. 01 (document currently at 03)
Review result Has Issues
Review completed: 2013-12-12

Review
review-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-12-12

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The issue I have with this document is that the Security Considerations
section sais "TBD". At least say something like "This document does not
update the Security Considerations of RFC 5031". 

Perhaps it could be argued that ECRIT URNs that are country-specific 
makes it more likely that they be targeted for local attacks but that
may be a stretch.

	Cheers Leif