Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01
review-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-12-12-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2013-12-06 | |
Requested | 2013-11-28 | |
Authors | Christer Holmberg , Ivo Sedlacek | |
I-D last updated | 2013-12-12 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Scott W. Brim
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Leif Johansson (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Leif Johansson |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 03) | |
Result | Has issues | |
Completed | 2013-12-12 |
review-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-12-12-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The issue I have with this document is that the Security Considerations section sais "TBD". At least say something like "This document does not update the Security Considerations of RFC 5031". Perhaps it could be argued that ECRIT URNs that are country-specific makes it more likely that they be targeted for local attacks but that may be a stretch. Cheers Leif