Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21

Request Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 22)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2020-03-03
Requested 2020-02-19
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Brian Rosen, Henning Schulzrinne, Hannes Tschofenig, Randall Gellens
Draft last updated 2020-03-02
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -18 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -18 by Mohit Sethi (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -21 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -21 by Gonzalo Salgueiro (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -22 by Charlie Kaufman
Genart Telechat review of -21 by Mohit Sethi (diff)
Thank you for reviewing this document from an Internet area point of view

Assignment Reviewer Gonzalo Salgueiro 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21-iotdir-telechat-salgueiro-2020-03-02
Posted at
Reviewed rev. 21 (document currently at 22)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2020-03-02


Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-21
Review result: Ready with Nits
Review type: iotdir - Last Call review
Requested version for review: Current
Review Date: 2020-03-02
Reviewer: Gonzalo Salgueiro

I am the assigned IoT directorate reviewer for <draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the IoT Directorate, see

This document describes (1) how method of including a CAP message in a SIP transaction by defining it as a block of "additional data" as well as (2) describes how a SIP MESSAGE transaction can be used to send a non-interactive call. I have reviewed this document from the IoT perspective and the document appears to be informative, clear and without obvious technical gaps. There are just a few the authors might consider addressing.


S: Abstract

"type of interactions" -> "types of interactions"


"alert specific" -> "alert-specific"


"Location specific" -> "Location-specific"


"Note that none of the security mechanism in this document" -> "Note that none of the security mechanisms in this document"