Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-21

Request Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 27)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-01-06
Requested 2016-12-16
Authors Randall Gellens , Hannes Tschofenig
I-D last updated 2017-01-06
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -21 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -21 by Dacheng Zhang (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -21 by Nevil Brownlee (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -23 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 21 (document currently at 27)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2017-01-06
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-21
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2017-01-05
IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-06
IESG Telechat date: 2017-01-19

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have

Major issues:

Minor issues:
-I find the document could be clearer if put in context with other documents
related to the topic/if any. -By eCall do we mean voice and video calls? (is
emergency sms another possibility?)

Nits/editorial comments:
-General: "next-generation eCall" and "NG-eCall" are both used. Would be
clearer to use only one. -[Page 10], "PSAP interpets"--typo-->"PSAP interprets"
-[Page 13], "package to accomodate"--typo-->"package to accommodate" -[Page
17], "how it it used"----->"how it is used" -[Page 17], "when it is is
required"----->"when it is required" -[Page 18], "it is is required"----->"it
is required"  (two occurrences) -[Page 18], "how it it used."----->"how it is
used." (two occurrences) -[Page 37], "Based on the the"---->"Based on the"

Best Regards,
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson Research