Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-21
review-ietf-ecrit-ecall-21-genart-lc-shirazipour-2017-01-06-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-21
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2017-01-05
IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-06
IESG Telechat date: 2017-01-19

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have
comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:
-I find the document could be clearer if put in context with other documents
related to the topic/if any. -By eCall do we mean voice and video calls? (is
emergency sms another possibility?)

Nits/editorial comments:
-General: "next-generation eCall" and "NG-eCall" are both used. Would be
clearer to use only one. -[Page 10], "PSAP interpets"--typo-->"PSAP interprets"
-[Page 13], "package to accomodate"--typo-->"package to accommodate" -[Page
17], "how it it used"----->"how it is used" -[Page 17], "when it is is
required"----->"when it is required" -[Page 18], "it is is required"----->"it
is required"  (two occurrences) -[Page 18], "how it it used."----->"how it is
used." (two occurrences) -[Page 37], "Based on the the"---->"Based on the"

Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson Research
www.ericsson.com