Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-psap-callback-13
review-ietf-ecrit-psap-callback-13-genart-telechat-gurbani-2013-11-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-psap-callback
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-10-08
Requested 2013-10-03
Authors Henning Schulzrinne , Hannes Tschofenig , Christer Holmberg , Milan Patel
Draft last updated 2013-11-26
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -10 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -13 by Vijay K. Gurbani
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ecrit-psap-callback-13-genart-telechat-gurbani-2013-11-26
Reviewed revision 13
Result Ready
Completed 2013-11-26
review-ietf-ecrit-psap-callback-13-genart-telechat-gurbani-2013-11-26-00
Vijay, thanks for the detailed review and Hannes thanks for the update! I have
balloted a No-Obj position for this draft.

Jari

On Sep 29, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>
wrote:

> Hi Vijay,
>
> thanks for the time to review the document so carefully.
>
> I have just submitted an updated version and I indeed think that your review
feedback has improved the quality of the document. > > Ciao > Hannes > > On
27.09.2013 22:17, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: >> Hannes: >> >> I am happy with the
changes outlined below. I am convinced they >> make the document better. Thank
you for attending to my comments. >> >> On 09/27/2013 01:48 PM, Hannes
Tschofenig wrote: >>> Hi Vijay, >>> >>> I updated the draft to take your
remarks into account. >>> >>> I liked the security requirements text to the
security threats section, >>> as you suggested. >>> >>> I believe you have a
point regarding the remark about the security >>> solution. The current
description focuses on the PSAP but not on the UA. >>> I assumed that we
essentially inherit the functionality from the >>> PhoneBCP document but that
should be expressed somewhere. >>> >>> So, I added the following section to the
draft: >>> >>> ---- >>> >>> The approach for dealing with implementing the
security requirements >>> described in Section 5.2 can be differentiated
between the behavior >>> applied by the UA and by SIP proxies. A UA that has
made an >>> emergency call will keep state information so that it can recognize
>>> and accepted a callback from the PSAP if it occurs within a >>> reasonable
time after an emergency call was placed, as described in >>> Section 13 of
[RFC6443]. Since UA considerations are described >>> already in [RFC6443] as
well as in [RFC6881] the rest of this section >>> focuses on the behavior of
SIP proxies. >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> What do you think about that addition? Do
you think it addresses your >>> concern? >> >> Cheers, >> >> - vijay > >
_______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list >
Gen-art at ietf.org >

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art