Telechat Review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04
review-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04-secdir-telechat-roca-2023-01-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2023-01-31 | |
Requested | 2023-01-16 | |
Authors | Martin Duke | |
I-D last updated | 2023-01-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04
by Acee Lindem
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -03 by Scott Hollenbeck (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Vincent Roca (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Genart Last Call review of -03 by Reese Enghardt (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -03 by Dr. Bernard D. Aboba (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -04 by Vincent Roca (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Vincent Roca |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04-secdir-telechat-roca-2023-01-27
|
|
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SDjexrx8ZovXWKk4ciNLFjvXWpU | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2023-01-27 |
review-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04-secdir-telechat-roca-2023-01-27-00
Hello, Following my previous review of version -03, it became clear that the context in which this document has been elaborated is quite different, and that a secdir review is not necessarily required. I can understand it and therefore have no further objection. Cheers, Vincent