Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-11
review-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-11-artart-lc-yee-2024-05-13-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2024-04-29
Requested 2024-04-15
Authors Pete Resnick
I-D last updated 2024-05-13
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by Thomas Fossati
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Sheng Jiang
Artart Last Call review of -11 by Joseph Yee
Assignment Reviewer Joseph Yee
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/3wrQvnufj0YETbUp6bTOTi4rPkE
Reviewed revision 11
Result Ready
Completed 2024-05-13
review-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-11-artart-lc-yee-2024-05-13-00
Greeting all,

I've reviewed the draft "draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis" version 11 and the
draft is ready with some 'personal preference' nits.

There are places with 'header fields' where 'header section' might be a better
term.  They are at Section 3.5 1st paragraph and 3rd paragraph as it is about
the information in the 'header section'. However, I considered it more into
personal preference rather than nits (or editorials that must be fixed).  If
editors/chairs or others considered 'header fields' is a better term I don't
see any concern.  'Header Fields' are used in other places in the draft (such
as section 2.2 and 3.6) and they are good that there's no need to change.

Best Regards,
Joseph Yee