IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc-07
review-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc-07-artart-lc-salz-2026-02-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2026-02-13
Requested 2026-01-30
Authors Dan Garcia-Carrillo , Rafael Marin-Lopez , Göran Selander , John Preuß Mattsson , Francisco Lopez-Gomez
I-D last updated 2026-06-11 (Latest revision 2026-06-11)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Ines Robles (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Rich Salz (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Rich Salz
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/E8MA9sao0CfyzJcaYoSkbsrSORw
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready
Completed 2026-02-02
review-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc-07-artart-lc-salz-2026-02-02-00
I am the ART reviewer for draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc, where the focus is on the
types of issues explained in
https://wiki.ietf.org/group/art/TypicalARTAreaIssues  I wonder if I were to
recursively expand all the acronyms in "draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc" if some kind
of compression record would be set? :)

The draft specifies how to use Diffie-Helman key exchange within the extensible
authentication protocol. It is layered on top of existing message structures
and exchanges, as explained in the introduction.

I really appreciated the overviews in sections 1.1 and 3.1

There are no ART issues. This document is ready from the ART perspective.