Last Call Review of draft-ietf-extra-6855bis-03
review-ietf-extra-6855bis-03-secdir-lc-lonvick-2024-08-30-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-extra-6855bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-08-29 | |
Requested | 2024-08-15 | |
Authors | Pete Resnick , Jiankang Yao , Arnt Gulbrandsen | |
I-D last updated | 2024-08-30 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -03
by Chris M. Lonvick
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -03 by Joseph Yee (diff) Genart Last Call review of -03 by Russ Housley (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-extra-6855bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/l7dZC1UJ0rmD4VyHCcWtMSXnatQ | |
Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 04) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-08-30 |
review-ietf-extra-6855bis-03-secdir-lc-lonvick-2024-08-30-00
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. As it says, the document maintains the structure and the information of RFC 6855 and notes its updates. The Security Considerations section is copies from the old document and is still appropriate. I found no nits in the document. Regards, Chris