Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09
review-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09-genart-lc-shirazipour-2020-09-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-09-14
Requested 2020-08-31
Authors Michael Slusarz
Draft last updated 2020-09-15
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Stefan Santesson (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -03 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Stefan Santesson (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Review review-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09-genart-lc-shirazipour-2020-09-15
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kpEExj2-woTwpPJi-18n5vhdEs4
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2020-09-15
review-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09-genart-lc-shirazipour-2020-09-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2020-09-15
IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have
some comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: In Section 4.2, it would have been good to give some
example and advice on when the client uses the preview to take some action. Is
this to be avoided? (Was not very clear to me).

Best Regards,
Meral Shirazipour
www.ericsson.com