Telechat Review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-06
review-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-06-genart-telechat-resnick-2018-07-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-07-31
Requested 2018-07-18
Authors Bron Gondwana
I-D last updated 2018-07-27
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Pete Resnick
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2018-07-27
review-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-06-genart-telechat-resnick-2018-07-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-06
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review Date: 2018-07-27
IETF LC End Date: 2018-07-13
IESG Telechat date: 2018-08-02

Summary: Ready with Nits

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Thanks for the changes responding to my review. Good work.

§5.2, ¶6:

OLD
   THREADID is optional, if the server doesn't support THREADID or is
NEW
   THREADID is OPTIONAL; if the server doesn't support THREADID or is

§5.2 ¶7:

Not clear to me why the THREADID and EMAILID can't be the same. I assume given
the MUST it's going to be some sort of interoperability problem, but it does
seem odd. But don't change it on my account.

§8.2 ¶2:

s/backend object collide/backend object identifiers