Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-extra-quota-06
review-ietf-extra-quota-06-genart-lc-dunbar-2021-09-13-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-extra-quota
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2021-09-10
Requested 2021-08-27
Authors Alexey Melnikov
Draft last updated 2021-09-13
Completed reviews Artart Last Call review of -06 by Todd Herr (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Shawn M Emery (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-extra-quota-06-genart-lc-dunbar-2021-09-13
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/GqWjP6VlMuwLNkPgE7_0XNZ3R18
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2021-09-13
review-ietf-extra-quota-06-genart-lc-dunbar-2021-09-13-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-extra-quota-06
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2021-09-13
IETF LC End Date: 2021-09-10
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The document describes an extension (QUOTA extension) to allow
administrative limits on resource usage to be manipulated by IMAP protocol.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Section 5.1 first paragraph:
" they MUST NOT refuse to APPEND a message if the  limit less the usage is
smaller than the RFC822.SIZE divided by 1024"

does it mean "must break the message" if the limit minus the usage is smaller
than  RFC822.size/1024?

"APPEND a message": what message is to be appended?

Why "divide by 1024"?

Thank you
Linda Dunbar