Last Call Review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-08
review-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-08-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2019-01-09-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-12-18 | |
Requested | 2018-12-04 | |
Authors | Kenneth Murchison , Bron Gondwana | |
I-D last updated | 2019-01-09 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by Ines Robles
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Dan Romascanu (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Has issues | |
Completed | 2019-01-09 |
review-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-08-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2019-01-09-00
The document extends the Sieve Email Filtering Language [RFC5228] by providing a number of action commands, some of which can generate additional messages of behalf of the user. It is a clear document, its target being developers and users of the protocol. I liked the fact that the authors included a 'Compatibility with Other Actions' section that describes the interoperability with existing deployed versions of the protocol, as well as the inclusion of a temporary section about Implementation Status. I am missing however some information about possible impact of the new action commands on deployment and operations on servers already in operation. I assume that scalability and compatibility between older and newer versions (including or not the new defined commands) were assessed, but this is not documented. Some confirmation, warnings (if any) and useful information that operators should know at deployment would be useful. I suggest that you consider adding such a paragraph or short section.