Last Call Review of draft-ietf-geojson-02
review-ietf-geojson-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-05-31-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-geojson
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-05-31
Requested 2016-05-19
Draft last updated 2016-05-31
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Melinda Shore (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Review review-ietf-geojson-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-05-31
Reviewed rev. 02 (document currently at 04)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2016-05-31

Review
review-ietf-geojson-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-05-31






I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting
 a new version of the draft.




 




For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.





 




Document: draft-ietf-geojson-03




Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour




Review Date: 2016-06-01




IETF LC End Date: 2016-05-31




IESG Telechat date: 2016-06-02




 




 




Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC, but I have some comments.




 




Major issues:




 




Minor issues:




 




Nits/editorial comments:




-[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything"




 




-[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?)




 




-[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference RFC5139.




 




-[Page 11], it says




"Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location




   uncertainty and confidence might treat ...




"




Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..."




 




-[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case"




 




-[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84" [OGCURL]. "




Should the URL  be moved to reference section?




 




-[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have"




 




-[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics"




 




-[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be"




 




 




Best Regards,




Meral




---




Meral Shirazipour




Ericsson Research




www.ericsson.com