Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-geojson-02
review-ietf-geojson-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-05-31-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-geojson
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-05-31
Requested 2016-05-19
Authors H. Butler , M. Daly , A. Doyle , Sean Gillies , T. Schaub , Stefan Hagen
I-D last updated 2016-05-31
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Melinda Shore (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-geojson by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 04)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2016-05-31
review-ietf-geojson-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-05-31-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting
 a new version of the draft.



For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.



Document: draft-ietf-geojson-03

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

Review Date: 2016-06-01

IETF LC End Date: 2016-05-31

IESG Telechat date: 2016-06-02





Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC, but I have
some comments.



Major issues:



Minor issues:



Nits/editorial comments:

-[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything"



-[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?)



-[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference RFC5139.



-[Page 11], it says

"Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location

   uncertainty and confidence might treat ...

"

Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not treat..."?
If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..."



-[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case"



-[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84" [OGCURL].
"

Should the URL  be moved to reference section?



-[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have"



-[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics"



-[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be"





Best Regards,

Meral

---

Meral Shirazipour

Ericsson Research

www.ericsson.com