Last Call Review of draft-ietf-geojson-02
review-ietf-geojson-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-05-31-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-geojson |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-05-31 | |
| Requested | 2016-05-19 | |
| Authors | H. Butler, M. Daly, A. Doyle, Sean Gillies, T. Schaub, T. Schaub | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-05-31 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Melinda Shore (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-geojson-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-05-31 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 02 (document currently at 04) | |
| Review result | Ready with Nits | |
| Review completed: | 2016-05-31 |
Review
review-ietf-geojson-02-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-05-31
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-geojson-03 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2016-06-01 IETF LC End Date: 2016-05-31 IESG Telechat date: 2016-06-02 Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC, but I have some comments. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything" -[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?) -[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference RFC5139. -[Page 11], it says "Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location uncertainty and confidence might treat ... " Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..." -[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case" -[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84" [OGCURL]. " Should the URL be moved to reference section? -[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have" -[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics" -[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be" Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com