Last Call Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations-
review-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations-secdir-lc-perlman-2009-06-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2009-06-09
Requested 2009-05-28
Draft last updated 2009-06-16
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Radia Perlman
Assignment Reviewer Radia Perlman
State Completed
Review review-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations-secdir-lc-perlman-2009-06-16
Review completed: 2009-06-16

Review
review-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations-secdir-lc-perlman-2009-06-16

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 


ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 


These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 


area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 


comments just like any other last call comments.






This document describes how to write documents that describe how to 


extract address information from various sources


to be translated into the format for the "Presence Information Data 


Format Location Object" (PIDF-LO) [RFC4119 <./rfc4119>]".



I found no security issues with the document.

(and only typos I noticed:
a missing period at the end of point 5 in section 4.1,
"receipients" in 5th bullet of section 3 should be "recipients",
missing "of" in 2nd paragraph of 4.2.3 "basic specification *of* which")

Radia