Last Call Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-01
review-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-01-genart-lc-moriarty-2013-02-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 02)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-02-27
Requested 2013-02-14
Authors Ray Bellis
Draft last updated 2013-02-23
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by Kathleen Moriarty (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Kathleen Moriarty
State Completed
Review review-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-01-genart-lc-moriarty-2013-02-23
Reviewed rev. 01 (document currently at 02)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2013-02-23

Review
review-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-01-genart-lc-moriarty-2013-02-23



I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on




Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at




< 

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.




 




Please wait for direction from your document shepherd




or AD before posting a new version of the draft.




 




Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-01




Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty




Review Date: February 23, 2013




IETF LC End Date: Thursday




IESG Telechat date: (if known)




 




Summary:  The draft is ready for publication, it is well written and the XML schema in section 4 validates properly.




 




 




Abstract:




   RFC 6155 specifies an extension for the HTTP-Enabled Location




   Delivery (HELD) Protocol allowing the use of an IP address and port




   number to request a Device location based on an individual packet




   flow.




 




   However, certain kinds of NAT require that identifiers for both ends




   of the packet flow must be specified in order to unambiguously




   satisfy the location request.




 




   This document specifies an XML Schema and URN Sub-Namespace for a




   Flow Identity Extension for HELD to support this requirement.




 




   This document updates RFC 6155 by deprecating the port number




   elements specified therein.




 




Major issues:




 




Minor issues:




 




Nits/editorial comments: