Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11
review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11-rtgdir-lc-bocci-2017-10-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-10-11 | |
Requested | 2017-09-27 | |
Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
Authors | Pierre Francois , Bruno Decraene , Cristel Pelsser , Keyur Patel , Clarence Filsfils | |
I-D last updated | 2017-10-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -11
by Matthew Bocci
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Matthew A. Miller (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Susan Hares |
|
Comments |
If needed, we can extend the review until before the Telechat date (the document is not yet scheduled). |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Matthew Bocci |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11-rtgdir-lc-bocci-2017-10-04
|
|
Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 13) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-10-04 |
review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11-rtgdir-lc-bocci-2017-10-04-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-11.txt Reviewer: Matthew Bocci Review Date: 4th October 2017 IETF LC End Date: 11th October 2017 Intended Status: Informational Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: The document is brief and to the point. I have no concerns about its quality or readability. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found.