Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13
review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13-opsdir-lc-hares-2018-01-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-01-11
Requested 2017-12-14
Authors Pierre Francois , Bruno Decraene , Cristel Pelsser , Keyur Patel , Clarence Filsfils
Draft last updated 2018-01-18
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -11 by Matthew Bocci (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Matthew A. Miller (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Susan Hares
Assignment Reviewer Susan Hares
State Completed
Review review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13-opsdir-lc-hares-2018-01-18
Reviewed revision 13
Result Has Nits
Completed 2018-01-18
review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13-opsdir-lc-hares-2018-01-18-00
Status: Nits

The operational procedures described in this process for the gshut comment are
accurately covered, and SHOULD work well.  The Appendices A-C add to an
operations document and should be retained for publication.

Technical nit:
location of technical nit: (section 4.3)
The document indicats that the "BGP implementers SHOULD provide configuration
knobs that utilize teh GRACEFUL_SHUTDOWN community."

What the problem is:
The document does not say is that their should be error reporting knobs to
track the use of GRACEFUL_SHUTDOWN community.  This can go in section 4.3 in
one or two sentences.

Editorial nit:
section 3. paragraph 2, p. 3

/This is because alternate paths can be hidden by knodes of an AS./
commment:  The implied "this" is too vague for a specification.

Fix:/This lack of path occurs because alternate paths can be hidden by nodes of
an AS."/