Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13
review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13-opsdir-lc-hares-2018-01-18-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-01-11 | |
Requested | 2017-12-14 | |
Authors | Pierre Francois , Bruno Decraene , Cristel Pelsser , Keyur Patel , Clarence Filsfils | |
I-D last updated | 2018-01-18 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -11
by Matthew Bocci
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Matthew A. Miller (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Susan Hares |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Susan Hares |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13-opsdir-lc-hares-2018-01-18
|
|
Reviewed revision | 13 | |
Result | Has Nits | |
Completed | 2018-01-18 |
review-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13-opsdir-lc-hares-2018-01-18-00
Status: Nits The operational procedures described in this process for the gshut comment are accurately covered, and SHOULD work well. The Appendices A-C add to an operations document and should be retained for publication. Technical nit: location of technical nit: (section 4.3) The document indicats that the "BGP implementers SHOULD provide configuration knobs that utilize teh GRACEFUL_SHUTDOWN community." What the problem is: The document does not say is that their should be error reporting knobs to track the use of GRACEFUL_SHUTDOWN community. This can go in section 4.3 in one or two sentences. Editorial nit: section 3. paragraph 2, p. 3 /This is because alternate paths can be hidden by knodes of an AS./ commment: The implied "this" is too vague for a specification. Fix:/This lack of path occurs because alternate paths can be hidden by nodes of an AS."/