Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08-secdir-telechat-takahashi-2017-06-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-06-06
Requested 2017-05-09
Authors Jared Mauch , Job Snijders , Greg Hankins
I-D last updated 2017-06-08
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Carlos M. Martínez (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Russ White (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Takeshi Takahashi
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Dale R. Worley
Assignment Reviewer Takeshi Takahashi
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 08
Result Ready
Completed 2017-06-08
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08-secdir-telechat-takahashi-2017-06-08-00
Hello,

I was re-assigned to review this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

[overall feeling on this draft]
ready

[overview of the changes after the 05 draft] Many changes are made.
Especially, this draft updates RFC4271, which anyway was cited in the normative
reference section. Moreover, the "solution" section was removed, (especially,
its 4th bullet was completely removed.) I believe the content became more
mature. As mentioned before, I see no problem in this draft.

Thank you.
Take

2017-04-17 12:07 GMT+09:00 Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>:
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
> area directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like
> any other last call comments.
>
> [overall feeling on this draft]
> ready
>
> [overview]
> This document defines the default behavior of a BGP speaker when there
> is no import or export policy associated with an External BGP session.
>
> This document is very concise.
> I do not have any discussion issues.
>
> Thank you.
> Take
>