Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-04
review-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-04-secdir-lc-salowey-2024-09-15-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-09-17 | |
| Requested | 2024-09-03 | |
| Authors | John Scudder , Paolo Lucente | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-09-15 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -04
by Joseph A. Salowey
(diff)
|
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Joseph A. Salowey |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ZfAinkLL0s6UuaW6lsn_8g2XjBY | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-09-15 |
review-ietf-grow-bmp-peer-up-04-secdir-lc-salowey-2024-09-15-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready The document adds a specific TLV for peer-up messages instead of sharing TLVs with initiation messages. This seems straightforward and the reference to RFC 7854 security considerations seems appropriate.