Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-06
review-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-06-rtgdir-lc-vigoureux-2017-04-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-04-21
Requested 2017-04-07
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Job Snijders, John Heasley, Martijn Schmidt
Draft last updated 2017-04-19
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Martin Vigoureux (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Stewart Bryant
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Klaas Wierenga (diff)
Comments
If needed, we could extend the review date until the Telechat -- this document hasn't been scheduled yet.
Assignment Reviewer Martin Vigoureux
State Completed
Review review-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-06-rtgdir-lc-vigoureux-2017-04-19
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 07)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-04-19

Review
review-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-06-rtgdir-lc-vigoureux-2017-04-19

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. 
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related 
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and 
sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide 
assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing 
Directorate, please see 
‚Äčhttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it 
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF 
Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through 
discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-06
Reviewer: Martin Vigoureux
Review Date: 2917-04-19
IETF LC End Date: 2917-04-21
Intended Status: Informational

Summary:
No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

The only reservation I have is that the Document doesn't say much on how 
operators should coordinate such that values they use have a consistent 
meaning. Maybe at least say that it is needed but out of the scope of 
the Document.

regards,
martin