Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores-

Request Review of draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-07-17
Requested 2012-07-05
Authors Anthony Kirkham
Draft last updated 2012-07-17
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Suresh Krishnan
Assignment Reviewer Suresh Krishnan
State Completed
Review review-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores-genart-lc-krishnan-2012-07-17
Completed 2012-07-17
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see


Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores-05.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2012/07/16
IESG Telechat date: 2012/07/19

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC
but I have some comments.


* Section 4:

It is not clear how Path MTU discovery is supported by TCP. Did you mean
TCP utilizes Path MTU discovery? If so, suggest rewording to


   Path MTU Discovery is
   supported by TCP over IPv4 [RFC1191], TCP over IPv6 [RFC1981] and
   some tunneling protocols such as GRE and IPSEC.


   Path MTU Discovery is
   utilized by TCP over IPv4 [RFC1191], TCP over IPv6 [RFC1981] and
   some tunneling protocols such as GRE and IPSEC.


* References

BCP38 *is* RFC2827 and BCP84 *is* RFC3704. Not sure why there are
duplicate references to these documents (once for the RFC number and
once for the BCP number)