Early Review of draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-10
review-ietf-hip-multihoming-10-rtgdir-early-white-2016-09-01-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-hip-multihoming |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2016-09-01 | |
Requested | 2016-08-16 | |
Authors | Thomas R. Henderson , Christian Vogt , Jari Arkko | |
I-D last updated | 2016-09-01 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Derek Atkins (diff) Intdir Early review of -09 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Carlos Pignataro (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -10 by Russ White (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Russ White |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-hip-multihoming by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 12) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-09-01 |
review-ietf-hip-multihoming-10-rtgdir-early-white-2016-09-01-00
Y'all -- I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-10 Reviewer: Russ White Review Date: 30 August 2016 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: This draft is well written; I did need to do some research on the background, but the pointers to the correct places to look are well called out in the draft. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found. == /r