Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-10
review-ietf-hip-multihoming-10-rtgdir-early-white-2016-09-01-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-hip-multihoming
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2016-09-01
Requested 2016-08-16
Authors Thomas R. Henderson , Christian Vogt , Jari Arkko
I-D last updated 2016-09-01
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -09 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Intdir Early review of -09 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -10 by Russ White (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ White
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-hip-multihoming by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-09-01
review-ietf-hip-multihoming-10-rtgdir-early-white-2016-09-01-00
Y'all --

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing
ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see


http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir



Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last
Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-10
Reviewer: Russ White 
Review Date: 30 August 2016
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: 

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

This draft is well written; I did need to do some research on the
background, but the pointers to the correct places to look are well called
out in the draft. 

Major Issues:

No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

No minor issues found.

==

/r