Early Review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-09
review-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-09-intdir-early-korhonen-2015-11-25-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-11-25 | |
Requested | 2015-11-25 | |
Authors | Julien Laganier , Lars Eggert | |
I-D last updated | 2015-11-25 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff) Intdir Early review of -09 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Qin Wu (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2015-11-25 |
review-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-09-intdir-early-korhonen-2015-11-25-00
Authors, I was appoited to do Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-09. You should treat these comments as any Last Call comments. I found the document well written and got only few clarifying questions. * In Section 4.1. the lifetime calculation does not actually define whether integer or floating point math is used. Depending on these or the lack of rounding guidance the lifetimes may end up to very different numbers. * Section 5. should probably have some text describing what happens if the certificate used to authz the service expires or gets revocated during the registration lifetime. Specifically what the registrar is supposed to do. Some obvious IDnits: == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-02 == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-08 - Jouni