Early Review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06
review-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06-intdir-early-jiang-2015-12-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-12-11 | |
| Requested | 2015-11-20 | |
| Authors | Julien Laganier , Lars Eggert | |
| Draft last updated | 2015-12-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06
by
Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Intdir Early review of -06 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Intdir Early review of -06 by Zhen Cao (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sheng Jiang |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06-intdir-early-jiang-2015-12-11
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2015-12-11 |
review-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06-intdir-early-jiang-2015-12-11-00
"I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html." ; This standard track document obsoletes RFC5204, which was Experimental. I guess this need support from various implementation and inter-operational tests. I personally don't know them, but I guess they already took place. The document is well written and ready for publication. This bis document has only little different from the original document: mainly two sentences section 4.2.2. The new text looks good. Regards, Sheng