Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-
review-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-secdir-lc-kaufman-2012-03-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2012-03-12
Requested 2012-03-01
Authors Zhen Cao , Baohong He , Yang Shi , Qin Wu , Glen Zorn
Draft last updated 2012-03-16
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Charlie Kaufman
Assignment Reviewer Charlie Kaufman
State Completed
Review review-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-secdir-lc-kaufman-2012-03-16
Completed 2012-03-16
review-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis-secdir-lc-kaufman-2012-03-16-00

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document
 editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last
 call comments.



This document incorporates the errata from rfc5296, but (as far as I could
tell) contained no technical changes. Advancing it should be non-controversial.
I found no typos. My only quibble is that it would have been helpful if there
had
 been an appendix (perhaps to be deleted when advanced) enumerating the changes
 since rfc5296.



                --Charlie