Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06
review-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06-rtgdir-telechat-bonica-2018-03-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-03-05
Requested 2018-02-12
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Juliusz Chroboczek
I-D last updated 2021-08-26 (Latest revision 2018-07-18)
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -02 by Leif Johansson (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -06 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ron Bonica
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-03-05
review-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06-rtgdir-telechat-bonica-2018-03-05-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06.txt
Reviewer: Ron Bonica
Review Date: March 5, 2018
IETF LC End Date: date-if-known
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

The draft is well-written and comprehensible.

The draft defines a required subset of Babel features for use in Homenets.
Given the topic, it is very difficult to argue with its conclusion.

Major Issues:

None

Minor Issues:

None

Nits:

None