Telechat Review of draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06
review-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06-rtgdir-telechat-bonica-2018-03-05-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-03-05 | |
Requested | 2018-02-12 | |
Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
Authors | Juliusz Chroboczek | |
I-D last updated | 2021-08-26 (Latest revision 2018-07-18) | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -02
by Leif Johansson
(diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -06 by Ron Bonica (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ron Bonica |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-03-05 |
review-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06-rtgdir-telechat-bonica-2018-03-05-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-06.txt Reviewer: Ron Bonica Review Date: March 5, 2018 IETF LC End Date: date-if-known Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: The draft is well-written and comprehensible. The draft defines a required subset of Babel features for use in Homenets. Given the topic, it is very difficult to argue with its conclusion. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Nits: None