Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-21
review-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-21-dnsdir-telechat-gieben-2022-10-14-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 24)
Type Telechat Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2022-10-18
Requested 2022-10-04
Authors Daniel Migault , Ralf Weber , Tomek Mrugalski
I-D last updated 2022-10-14
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -20 by Al Morton (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -21 by Ines Robles (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -21 by Bron Gondwana (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -21 by Hilarie Orman (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -21 by Al Morton (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -21 by R. (Miek) Gieben (diff)
Assignment Reviewer R. (Miek) Gieben
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/URuObx2sodOATOXl_JmDeeGZwns
Reviewed revision 21 (document currently at 24)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2022-10-14
review-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-21-dnsdir-telechat-gieben-2022-10-14-00
A straight forward document specifying dhcpv6 options, had little trouble
reading it. Got a bit lost with acronyms though, i.e. forgetting what ORO is
when nearing the end of the document.

Any reason why DNS over HTTP (DoH, RFC 8484) isn't standardized in the same
document?

A Nit (maybe): in section 4.2: "... defined by standard." -> "... defined by
standard action" ?