Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog-06
review-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog-06-secdir-telechat-salazar-2024-12-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-12-03
Requested 2024-11-26
Authors Kevin Smith
I-D last updated 2024-12-04
Completed reviews Artart Last Call review of -05 by Tim Bray (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Mallory Knodel (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Joey Salazar (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -06 by Joey Salazar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joey Salazar
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Q96yy4ZUPFdovPUvipXKxM6gczE
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-12-04
review-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog-06-secdir-telechat-salazar-2024-12-04-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

Please note that I previously reviewed version 05 of this draft and at that
time stated that the document was "Ready with Issues".

I am therefore only reviewing the differences between version 05 and current
version (06) and, due to time constrains for the upcoming Telechat, only
those differences pertaining to my previous review.

The summary of the review is: Ready

Major Concerns: None
The major concern highlighted in the previous review has been addressed with
the text added to the Security Considerations in section 8. The new text covers
the cases mentioned in my previous review and recommended references.

Minor Concerns: None

Nits:

All nits have been addressed except the double spacing between the end of a
sentence and the beginning of the next sentence in the same paragraph, which
can be interpreted as a styling choice. No new nits to remark on.

Thank you for the quick update and incorporation of feedback.