Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04
review-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04-secdir-lc-cooley-2022-11-01-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-11-03 | |
Requested | 2022-10-20 | |
Authors | Mark Nottingham , Erik Wilde , Sanjay Dalal | |
I-D last updated | 2022-11-01 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Pete Resnick
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -04 by Jean Mahoney (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Deb Cooley (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Deb Cooley |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/TpD_Xfp2tVlnPmVU2RM8ZKj4p74 | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-11-01 |
review-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04-secdir-lc-cooley-2022-11-01-00
I'm far from an http expert, but I thought this draft was written clearly and was easy to understand. The Security Considerations seem to cover the appropriate issues especially that there is possibly duplicate information in various status types (not the biggest issue, but pretty subtle).