Telechat Review of draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-06
review-ietf-httpauth-extension-06-opsdir-telechat-casarez-2016-08-16-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpauth-extension |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-08-26 | |
| Requested | 2016-08-01 | |
| Authors | Yutaka Oiwa , Hajime Watanabe , Hiromitsu Takagi , Kaoru Maeda , Tatsuya Hayashi , Yuichi Ioku | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-08-16 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by
Matthew A. Miller
(diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Rick Casarez (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Rick Casarez |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-httpauth-extension-06-opsdir-telechat-casarez-2016-08-16
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Has Nits | |
| Completed | 2016-08-16 |
review-ietf-httpauth-extension-06-opsdir-telechat-casarez-2016-08-16-00
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Ready with a nit Section 3, paragraph 3: Some sentence cleanup is required so that this remains clear. I believe I understand what is being said as far as implementation goes but some cleanup would make this paragraph more concise. ------------------- Cheers, Rick