Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-01
review-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-01-tsvart-lc-perkins-2018-12-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Transport Area Review Team (tsvart) | |
Deadline | 2018-12-11 | |
Requested | 2018-11-27 | |
Authors | Stephen Ludin , Mark Nottingham , Nick Sullivan | |
I-D last updated | 2018-12-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -01
by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -01 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -01 by Colin Perkins (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Colin Perkins |
State | Completed Snapshot | |
Review |
review-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-01-tsvart-lc-perkins-2018-12-06
|
|
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-12-06 |
review-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-01-tsvart-lc-perkins-2018-12-06-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. I have reviewed draft-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-01. It defines a new HTTP header that can be used to detect CDN forwarding loops. There are no apparent transport issues. Editorial: The terminology 'The CDN-Loop Request Header' can easily be misread to suggest that the CDN is being requested to loop traffic. Using instead 'The "CDN-Loop" Request Header' might make this clearer. Colin