Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25
review-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-12-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 26)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-12-17
Requested 2013-10-21
Authors Roy T. Fielding , Julian Reschke
I-D last updated 2013-12-03
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -25 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -24 by Menachem Dodge (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -24 by Klaas Wierenga (diff)
Secdir Early review of -?? by Klaas Wierenga
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 25 (document currently at 26)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2013-12-03
review-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-12-03-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq

  .



Please resolve any Last Call comments you may receive.





Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

Review Date: 2013-11-18/2013-12-02

IETF LC End Date: End of November (special deadline)

IESG Telechat date: 2013-12-19







Summary:

This draft is almost ready to be published as Proposed Standard but I have some
comments.





Major issues:

none





Minor issues:

none





Nits/editorial comments:

Part 4 of:

draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging (82 pages)

draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics (98 pages)

*draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional (27 pages)

draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range (24 pages)

draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache (41 pages)

draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth (18 pages)

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations (7 pages)

draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations (5 pages)



-[Page 4], Introduction, it would make the draft clearer if we give 1-2 every
day examples of when conditions are used/useful.



-[Page 10], "filesystem"---->"file system"



-General comment: since mostly used with caching, why not considered merging
with part 6?



- [Page 22], Security section, as mentioned in my other reviews, would it be
better to have a separate draft to discuss all security issues related to HTTP?



Best Regards,

Meral



---

Meral Shirazipour

Ericsson Research

www.ericsson.com