Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10
review-ietf-httpbis-priority-10-genart-lc-robles-2021-11-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-priority
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2021-11-29
Requested 2021-11-15
Authors Kazuho Oku , Lucas Pardue
I-D last updated 2021-11-29
Completed reviews Tsvart Last Call review of -10 by Bob Briscoe (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Ines Robles (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ines Robles
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-priority by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/k0c2L3WOP5A_dxSAHzy6PkmoHvw
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2021-11-29
review-ietf-httpbis-priority-10-genart-lc-robles-2021-11-29-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2021-11-29
IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-29
IESG Telechat date: 2022-01-06

Summary:

The document describes a scheme that allows an HTTP client to communicate its
preferences for how the upstream server prioritizes responses to its requests,
and also allows a server to hint to a downstream intermediary how its responses
should be prioritized when they are forwarded.

The document does not present major issues, just one minor nit.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Page 6: "Multiple experiments from independent research have shown" --> please
add references to this claim

Thank you for this document,

Ines.