Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
review-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04-genart-lc-bryant-2017-02-23-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2017-02-20 | |
Requested | 2017-02-06 | |
Authors | Julian Reschke | |
I-D last updated | 2017-02-23 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -04
by Jouni Korhonen
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Dacheng Zhang (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Stewart Bryant |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-02-23 |
review-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04-genart-lc-bryant-2017-02-23-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-?? Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2017-02-23 IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-20 IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-02 Summary: Thus is ready for publication. There are two minor nits, but these can be delegated to the RFC Editor. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: Should say Obsoletes: RFC5987 (if approved) ("RFC" missing) Extended notation, using the Unicode characters U+00A3 ("£", POUND SIGN) and U+20AC ("€", EURO SIGN): My European computer can display £ and €, but not sure if all can or whether the RFC series supports these symbols. There symbols were not present in RFC5987, they were just named. FYI Nits complains about obsoleting RFC2231 can be ignored The nits complaint about RFC2616 can be ignored The nits complaint about RFC2978 cab be ignored