Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
review-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04-genart-lc-bryant-2017-02-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-02-20
Requested 2017-02-06
Authors Julian Reschke
Draft last updated 2017-02-23
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Dacheng Zhang (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04-genart-lc-bryant-2017-02-23
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 05)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-02-23

Review
review-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04-genart-lc-bryant-2017-02-23

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-??
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2017-02-23
IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-20
IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-02

Summary: 

Thus is ready for publication. There are two minor nits, but these can be delegated to the RFC Editor.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 

Should say

Obsoletes: RFC5987 (if approved) ("RFC" missing)

Extended notation, using the Unicode characters U+00A3 ("£", POUND
SIGN) and U+20AC ("€", EURO SIGN):

My European computer can display £ and €, but not sure if all can or whether the RFC series supports these symbols. There symbols were not present in RFC5987, they were just named.

FYI
Nits complains about obsoleting RFC2231 can be ignored
The nits complaint about RFC2616 can be ignored
The nits complaint about RFC2978 cab be ignored