Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
review-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04-secdir-lc-zhang-2017-02-23-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-02-20 | |
Requested | 2017-02-06 | |
Authors | Julian Reschke | |
I-D last updated | 2018-12-20 (Latest revision 2017-02-20) | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -04
by Jouni Korhonen
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Dacheng Zhang (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -04 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dacheng Zhang |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-02-23 |
review-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04-secdir-lc-zhang-2017-02-23-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document specifies an encoding suitable for use in HTTP header fields that is compatible with a simplified profile of the encoding defined in RFC2231, and obsoletes RFC5987. Compared to RFC 5987, the updates in this document does not introduce any additional security considerations, and the contents in the security considerations section is exactly identical to the counterparts in RFC 5987. So, I agree this document is ready for publication as Proposed Standard. Cheers Dacheng