Telechat Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15
review-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15-genart-telechat-worley-2017-05-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-05-09
Requested 2017-04-26
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Dale Worley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Dale Worley (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Dale Worley
Review review-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15-genart-telechat-worley-2017-05-09
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/DrYEtCA-6NfPP3GO7jgMNuCrLkc
Reviewed rev. 15 (document currently at 16)
Review result Ready with Nits
Last updated 2017-05-09

Review
review-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15-genart-telechat-worley-2017-05-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.  The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15
Reviewer:  Dale R. Worley
Review Date:  2017-05-09
IETF LC End Date:  2017-03-22
IESG Telechat date:  2017-05-11

Summary:

       This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits
       that should be fixed before publication.

There is one remaining nit:

2.  Terminology

   Security Service Provider:    A provider of security services to the
      customers (end-users or enterprises) using NSF equipment purchased
      from vendors or created by the service provider.

Per my discussion with the authors, the intended style is to not
specifically capitalize the term "security service provider".  Hence,
this entry headword should be "Security service provider".

[END]