Telechat Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15
review-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15-genart-telechat-worley-2017-05-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-05-09
Requested 2017-04-26
Authors Susan Hares , Diego Lopez , Myo Zarny , Christian Jacquenet , Rakesh Kumar , Jaehoon Paul Jeong
I-D last updated 2017-05-09
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -15 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dale R. Worley
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2017-05-09
review-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15-genart-telechat-worley-2017-05-09-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.  The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-15
Reviewer:  Dale R. Worley
Review Date:  2017-05-09
IETF LC End Date:  2017-03-22
IESG Telechat date:  2017-05-11

Summary:

       This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits
       that should be fixed before publication.

There is one remaining nit:

2.  Terminology

   Security Service Provider:    A provider of security services to the
      customers (end-users or enterprises) using NSF equipment purchased
      from vendors or created by the service provider.

Per my discussion with the authors, the intended style is to not
specifically capitalize the term "security service provider".  Hence,
this entry headword should be "Security service provider".

[END]