Early Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-17
review-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-17-opsdir-early-mishra-2022-05-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-16
Requested revision 16 (document currently at 26)
Type Early Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2022-06-17
Requested 2022-05-17
Requested by Linda Dunbar
Authors Sangwon Hyun , Jaehoon Paul Jeong , TaeKyun Roh , Sarang Wi , Park Jung-Soo
I-D last updated 2022-05-25
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Last Call review of -08 by Reshad Rahman (diff)
Secdir Early review of -17 by Scott G. Kelly (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -17 by Gyan Mishra (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -23 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -23 by Scott G. Kelly (diff)
Comments 
We appreciate Ops Area and Security Area Directorate review before the WGLC. 

Thank you very much
Linda Dunbar
Assignment Reviewer Gyan Mishra
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-17-opsdir-early-mishra-2022-05-25
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/VX-e__d74cVi72G4Sa1-bKlANaQ
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 26)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-05-25
review-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-17-opsdir-early-mishra-2022-05-25-00
I reviewed the draft and the draft is well written and ready to be progressed
for publication.

One comment below.

Appendix A contains XML examples of I2NSF Interface Data.

Draft below also referenced by this draft contains as well the same identical
examples but calls it examples of registration of capabilities and not
registration interface data.

As this draft is about the Yang Data and Information model for I2NSF
registration interface between the security controller and DMS and not about
registration capabilities data model defined in draft below,  I think the
entire Appendix A can be removed from the draft.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model