Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-06
review-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-06-opsdir-telechat-jethanandani-2016-08-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2016-08-16
Requested 2016-08-01
Authors Susan Hares , Daniel Migault , Joel M. Halpern
I-D last updated 2016-08-16
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Radia Perlman (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Radia Perlman (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Tomonori Takeda (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mahesh Jethanandani
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 17)
Result Has nits
Completed 2016-08-16
review-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-06-opsdir-telechat-jethanandani-2016-08-16-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate’s ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
 These comments were written with the intent of improving the
operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last
call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors
and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last
call comments.

Document reviewed:  draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-06

Summary:

The abstract of the document says “

This presents security-related requirements for the I2RS protocol for mutual
authentication, transport protocols, data transfer and transactions”

.

This document is on a informational track.

The document defines security requirements and as such does not discuss how the
requirements are met.

Because the document is about requirements and does not define how the
requirements should/are to be met, there are no management or operational
considerations that need to be discussed about the document.

A run of idnits reveals a few warnings, which will probably be fixed as the
document progresses towards a RFC.

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  == Missing Reference: 'I7498-2' is mentioned on line 166, but not defined

  == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture has been published as

     RFC 7921

  == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement has been published

     as RFC 7920

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-15) exists of

     draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-06

  == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements has been

     published as RFC 7923

  == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability has been published as

     RFC 7922

Thanks.

Mahesh Jethanandani

mjethanandani at gmail.com