Last Call Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06
review-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06-opsdir-lc-jiang-2016-05-03-00

Hi, OPS-DIR, Authors,



I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written with the intent of improving the operational
 aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may
 be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG
 chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.



This Informational document presents requirements for a service that allows
client applications to subscribe to updates of a YANG datastore. This document
is well written. I don't see any major issues from the operations
 and management perspective. It is ready to be published with a couple of minor
 comments below:



There are normative language/key works definitions and usages while it is an
Informational document. I am raising this as a minor concern since I don

’

t
 think there is an unified

“

standard

”

 on this. But I personally prefer not use mormative
 key works in an informational document



There are many abbreviations have not given the full name, even in the first
appearance.



Typo:



Last paragraph of section 2: defacto/default

“

SNMP and MIBs will remain widely deployed and the

defacto

 choice for many monitoring solutions.

”



Regards,



Sheng