Telechat Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-10
review-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-10-genart-telechat-bryant-2018-03-02-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2018-03-06 | |
Requested | 2018-02-15 | |
Authors | Lixing Wang , Mach Chen , Amit Dass , Hariharan Ananthakrishnan , Sriganesh Kini , Nitin Bahadur | |
I-D last updated | 2018-03-02 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -05
by John Scudder
(diff)
Opsdir Early review of -10 by Sarah Banks (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -10 by Mike McBride (diff) Yangdoctors Early review of -09 by Ebben Aries (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Derrell Piper (diff) Genart Telechat review of -10 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Stewart Bryant |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 15) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-03-02 |
review-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-10-genart-telechat-bryant-2018-03-02-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-10 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2018-03-02 IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-30 IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05 Summary: Read this from the perspective of a generalist rather that as a routing specialist in the expectation that other routing specialist would read the YANG model in detail and compare it to the text and there experience of operational routers. From that perspective this seems ready to be published. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: None