Last Call Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-13
review-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-13-genart-lc-shirazipour-2020-07-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-06-25
Requested 2020-06-11
Authors Jie Dong, Xiugang Wei, Qin Wu, Mohamed Boucadair, Anders Liu
Draft last updated 2020-07-02
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Henning Rogge (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Henning Rogge (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -04 by Ladislav Lhotka (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -13 by Ladislav Lhotka (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -13 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Christian Huitema (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -14 by Christian Huitema (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-13-genart-lc-shirazipour-2020-07-02
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/TvJvB6V0p4jau8V2oZMesaVcymA
Reviewed rev. 13 (document currently at 18)
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2020-06-26

Review
review-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-13-genart-lc-shirazipour-2020-07-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-13

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2020-05-26
IETF LC End Date: 2020-05-25
IESG Telechat date: NA


Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments.


Major issues:


Minor issues:
Is it possible to add in the abstract and or intro where the info of the topology information is to be used?
Maybe borrowing some text from RFC8345.


Nits/editorial comments:
[Page 21], Section 6, "NMDA-complient"---->"NMDA-compliant"

Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson
Research
www.ericsson.com