Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13
review-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13-genart-lc-kyzivat-2017-12-01-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-12-11
Requested 2017-11-27
Authors Alexander Clemm , Jan Medved , Robert Varga , Xufeng Liu , Hariharan Ananthakrishnan , Nitin Bahadur
I-D last updated 2017-12-01
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -01 by Tony Przygienda (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -08 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Hilarie Orman (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -02 by Carl Moberg (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -10 by Christian Hopps (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -10 by Ladislav Lhotka (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -10 by Michael Richardson (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Hilarie Orman (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -13 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Paul Kyzivat
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2017-12-01
review-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13-genart-lc-kyzivat-2017-12-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area 
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other 
last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at 
<​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2017-12-01
IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-11
IESG Telechat date: TBD

Summary:

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should 
be fixed before publication.

Disclaimer:

I conducted this review without any knowledge of YANG modeling. So the 
sort of review I can do is superficial.

Issues:

Major: 0
Minor: 0
Nits:  2

(1) NIT: Section 1 - Language

s/example model is/an example model is/
s/full-blown OSPF model/a complete OSPF model/
s/augments general network/augments the general network/


(2) NIT: Section 4 - typo

Something is wrong with:

    The YANG modules ietf-network and ietf-network are designed to be
    used in conjunction with implementations that support the Network

Did you perhaps mean:

    The YANG modules ietf-network and ietf-network-topology are ...