Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-02
review-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-02-rtgdir-early-drake-2016-04-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 20)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2016-04-25
Requested 2016-04-13
Authors Alexander Clemm , Jan Medved , Robert Varga , Nitin Bahadur , Hariharan Ananthakrishnan , Xufeng Liu
I-D last updated 2016-04-25
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -02 by John Drake (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Ines Robles (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -02 by Kent Watsen (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -14 by Ines Robles (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -14 by Kent Watsen (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Radia Perlman (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -18 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -18 by Qin Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer John Drake
State Completed
Review review-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-02-rtgdir-early-drake-2016-04-25
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 20)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-04-25
review-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-02-rtgdir-early-drake-2016-04-25-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ‚Äč

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-02.txt
Reviewer: John E Drake
Review Date: 21-Apr-2016
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:
Choose from this list...

    No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

    A very well written and comprehensible draft.

Major Issues:

    No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

    No minor issues found.

Yours Irrespectively,

John