Last Call Review of draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08
review-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08-genart-lc-kyzivat-2019-03-13-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2019-03-18 | |
Requested | 2019-03-04 | |
Authors | Brian Haberman , Joseph Lorenzo Hall , Jason Livingood | |
I-D last updated | 2019-03-13 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -08
by Christian Huitema
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Ben Niven-Jenkins (diff) Genart Last Call review of -08 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Paul Kyzivat |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2019-03-13 |
review-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08-genart-lc-kyzivat-2019-03-13-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc4071bis-08 Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat Review Date: 2019-03-13 IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-18 IESG Telechat date: ? Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Issues: Major: 0 Minor: 1 Nits: 3 1) NIT: In the following in section 4.8: Any major change to the IASA 2.0 arrangements shall require a similar level of community consensus and deliberation and ... It isn't clear to me what "similar" refers to. 2) NIT: The following passage from section 6.10: Board decisions may be made either by vote communicated in a meeting of the Board (including telephonic and video), or via an asynchronous written (including electronic) process. Absentee voting and voting by proxy shall not be permitted. confuses me. Absentee voting isn't permitted, but asynchronous written voting is permitted. What is the distinction? 3) NIT: Regarding the following from section 6.11: As a result, an Interim Board was formed on a temporary basis until the first full board was constituted. ... o One ISOC trustee, selected by the ISOC Board of Trustees This is written in the past tense, so I guess it has already happened. But the "individuals" are only identified in the abstract. I would think this should identify specific individuals. Perhaps that isn't necessary for the ex officio members since they can be resolved to a particular individual at any time. But that isn't so for the ISOC trustee.